|
|
|
You have no items in your cart.
 |
Is God To Blame?
This is often the question that comes to mind when we confront real suffering in our own lives or in the lives of those we love. Pastor Gregory A. Boyd helps us deal with this question honestly and biblically, while avoiding glib answers.
Writing for ordinary Christians, Boyd wrestles with a variety of answers that have been offered by theologians and pastors in the past. He finds that a fully Christian approach must keep the person and work of Jesus Christ at the very center of what we say about human suffering and God's place in it. Yet this is often just what is missing and what makes so much talk about the subject seem inadequate and at times even misleading.
What comes through in Is God to Blame? is a hopeful picture of a sovereign God who is relentlessly opposed to evil, who knows our sufferings and who can be trusted to bring us through them to renewed life.
"In this stimulating work, Gregory Boyd shows how an incarmational theology focuses on God's action in Jesus Christ as the source for our knowledge of God. in Jesus we see what God does for us, how God loves us, how God feels for us and how God rescuues creatures and creation. This work restores an ancient view of Christianity that emphasizes the freedom we have to enter into a joyous relationship with God- a worlkview of hope for all of humanity."
''Robert Webber, Meyers Professor of Ministy, Northern Seminary, Lonbard, Illinois''
"In this new book from the pen of pastor-theologian Greg Boyd, we discover an answer to one of life's most difficult questions: If God is good, who do bad things happen? Boyd advances a radical notion: human history is a battle between God and Satan. We are part of this struggle, and what the future holds is (in part) up to us. Things are not all fixed from eternity. Agree or disagree, Boyd makes Christian faith exciting. I recommend this book to thoughtful Christians everywhere."
''Alan G. Padgett, Professor of Systematic Theology, Luther Seminary''
"Greg Boyd addresses what may be the single most asked question among skeptics and seekers. many without Christ are still waiting for us to respond with an intelligent answer. Greg provides an apologetic that actually makes sense about an iddue that really matters!"
''Erwin Raphael McManus, Lead Pastor, Mosaic, Los Angeles''
''About the Author''
''Gregory A. Boyd'' is the founder and senior pasator of Woodland Hills Church in St. Paul, Minnesota, and founder and president of Christus Victor Ministries. He was professor of theology from 1986 to 2002 at Bethel Seminary in St. Paul. Boyd is a graduate of Princeton Theological Seminary (Ph.D.), Yale University Divinity School (M.Div.), and the University of Minnesota (BA). He is a national and international conference speaker and has authored thirteen previous books including Is God To Blame?, Seeing Is Believing, Repenting of Religion, and the award-winning Letters from a Skeptic. He is cofounder of Theosynergistic Neuro-Transformation (TNT). Boyd and his wife, Shelly, live in ST. Paul and have three children.
|
|
 |
Breakthrough
I painted this painting during a conference in Manhattan Beach California in 2007. There were many intercessors praying for the region. The words that were coming forth were that a move of God would come from the west coast and move east. I sat on the beach and watch the waves come in through the pier. The power of the waves broke against the pillars as if coming through gates. The four horses represent the power of God that goes out through the earth to the north south east, and west.
|
Copyright © 2008 Aslan's Place. All rights reserved.
18990 Rock Springs Rd.
Hesperia, CA 92345
Phone: (760) 947-7881
FAX: (760) 513-9510
|
|
Prayer For Divine Intervention and Release Into Your Birthright
Dr. Pul L. Cox
The essence of every prayer discussed in this book is the need to repent for generational iniquity. The purpose is so that we can be released into our birthright. The Prayer for Divine Intervention and Release into Your Birthright is a prayer that was specifically given by the Lord to claim back all the treasures that have been lost in the family line by generational sin. The following article discusses some of the issues surrounding generational iniquity.
What’s all this “Generational” Stuff? Kelsey Budd Exodus 20:5 “You shall not bow down yourself to them or serve them [idols]; for I the Lord your God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children to the third and fourth generation of those who hate Me, but showing mercy and steadfast love to a thousand generations of those who love Me and keep My commandments.” We believe the issue of generational iniquity is best illustrated in the familiar story of Cain. Let’s review. Cain and his brother Abel brought a sacrifice to the Lord; Abel’s sacrifice was found worthy in God’s eyes, while Cain’s was not. This story marks an important distinction between sin, rebellion and iniquity. When Cain became angry, sad and dejected, the Lord said to Cain, “Sin crouches at your door; its desire is for you, but you must master it.” In response to this, Cain did three things. First, and perhaps most profoundly, he departed from the presence of the Lord. Next, he convinced his brother to come out to the field, where he killed him. Lastly, when the Lord asked him where his brother was, Cain replied, “Am I my brother’s keeper?” And after this answer, the Lord cursed Cain. We may define sin simply as separation from God, and Cain’s “departing from the presence of the Lord” exemplifies this. In the Old Testament, the law required sin offerings for such things as coming in contact with a dead animal carcass or a dead body, so we can see that sin occurs from actions as simple as taking our eyes off God and going astray; there is not necessarily any malicious intent. Rebellion, on the other hand, occurs when we knowingly do that which God has commanded us and charged us not to do, when we “do it anyway.” For generational issues, however, iniquity becomes our primary concern, and Cain’s answer to God demonstrates iniquity. The Lord asks Cain, “Where is your brother?” and Cain does not say, “Lord, I have sinned greatly, for I have committed murder upon my own brother.” He does not even respond rebelliously, “Listen, I know it’s against the rules, but I killed Abel, so could we just get this punishment thing over with, Lord?” Instead, he replies, “Am I my brother’s keeper?” Cain gives an answer that distorts the truth; he chooses not to confess the truth with contrition, nor to tell the truth, albeit without remorse (like the second response example), but his response is crafted to cover his sin and rebellion, and thus evade consequences altogether. Thus, we may define iniquity as a twisted response to God. The Hebrew word avown is translated here as iniquity, and this word comes from the root word avah, which Strong’s translates as “do amiss, bow down, make crooked, pervert.” God curses Cain for his actions, and Cain replies, “My punishment is too great!” The word translated as “punishment” is actually avown; so Cain is quite literally saying, “My crookedness is too great.” “Crookedness’ “may refer to either his own crooked ways, the punishment that comes with them, or both. Thus, it is quite literally this crookedness, this twisting of Cain’s sin that is visited upon his descendants in the sense of the curse, the punishment, but also in the sense of Cain’s distorted response. Let’s get some perspective. The Father sent His Son, Jesus, to atone once and for all for our sins on the cross. He bore the weight of all our sins, and He became a curse for us, so that we might have freedom. He has conquered sin once and for all. He alone could bear it. The victory is His. If we can become as Paul described, so that “it is not me who lives, but Christ in me,” then we can carry His victory in us. We believe the Father “visits the iniquity of the fathers on the sons” not because He has a heart to burden us, but so that we may be confronted with this twisting of the truth, rise to the challenge and overcome it, not through our own righteousness, but through the righteous sacrifice of the One Who lives in us, Jesus. We believe this occurs so that we, the sons, may be presented with this wrong response, perceive this sin, and be given the opportunity to “master it” that our fathers squandered. Rev 3:5 says the following: Thus shall he who conquers be clad in white garments, and I will not erase or blot out his name from the Book of Life; I will acknowledge him as Mine, and I will confess his name openly before My Father and before His angels. The reward is promised to be great for those who persevere and learn to overcome. That’s So Old Testament! Yes. That is exactly where it is. Consider this question: What is a Testament? The American Heritage Dictionary defines it this way. Testament serves as tangible proof of evidence. It comes from the Latin word testis, which can be translated roughly to mean “witness.” Who or what does the Old Testament give evidence of? Who or What is it a witness to? You may be rolling your eyes, because of course it is Jesus that the Old Testament gives witness to. But don’t shrug this aside; it’s the reason we still carry all those pages around in our Bibles. The testament may be old, but as for the Jesus it testifies of, He is still the same. He does not change. If doubt still lingers about the relevance of the Old Testament, consider Luke 16:31, wherein Jesus gave us some stunning words in His parable about the rich man and the beggar, Lazarus: “But he said to him, ‘If they do not hear Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded though one rise from the dead.” Those are probably not particularly comforting words. Those who find themselves echoing the objection about generational iniquity being confined to the Old Testament probably consider Gal 5:3-4, which says: “And I testify again to every man who becomes circumcised that he is a debtor to keep the whole law. You have become estranged from Christ, you who attempt to be justified by law; you have fallen from grace.” Much of the Old Testament, in other words, the law describes God’s commands to the Israelites. Paul exhorts us here not to try and work out our salvation through the law. But even in the Old Testament, God expresses contempt for songs, offerings and festivals because of the people’s attitude. All of these were in keeping with the law. The Lord almost killed Balaam for having a wrong attitude and being spiritually insensitive, even though he was following the command of the Lord. The law was created to give witness to God, to His holiness. It was created to guard us from sin before we put faith in Jesus. It was also created to produce conviction in us, which would, in turn, reveal to us our inability to produce right standing with God through our own efforts. For that, we need a Savior. Jesus lived his life in perfect submission to the law, so that we would not place our faith in the law, but in the One who fulfilled it. Again, He said, “I came not to abolish the law, but to fulfill it.” Through Him, we can live in harmony as Paul describes in Eph 2:20:”… having been built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ Himself being the chief cornerstone…”
God can change and has changed His commands in keeping with His time or season. Acts 11 describes how He repealed the commands to only eat the flesh of certain animals just before the first Gentiles received the Spirit. In the verse above, Paul fervently urges the brethren against circumcision. Let’s reexamine Exodus 20:5. This verse, describing generational iniquity, has no command. It’s not the law. It is not even an impersonal, categorical description of how God’s legal system works, such as, “The wages of sin are death.” Exodus 20:5 describes God. Read it again:”…you shall not bow down to them nor serve them. For I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children to the third and fourth generations of those who hate Me.” This describes not the law, but a characteristic of God’s ways and His justice. The Lord loves righteousness right now just as much as He did in the days of Adam. He still does not despise those with a contrite heart and a broken spirit. And although He sent Jesus to be a friend to sinners and release us from bondage, He still hates sin. What He tells us to do may depend on context, but His character does not change. Lest there be any confusion about the subject of generational sin in our “new covenant times”, consider the words of the Lord in Luke 11:47-51 (Amplified): Woe to you! For you are rebuilding and repairing the tombs of the prophets, whom your fathers killed. So you bear witness and give your full approval and consent to the deeds of your fathers; for they actually killed them, and you rebuild and repair monuments to them…So that the blood of all the prophets shed from the foundation of the world may be charged against and required of this age and generation. Clearly, Jesus is explicitly telling us here that as these men inherited the sins of their fathers, they could be held accountable for them according to the way these men responded. The Pharisees chose to honor the prophets in much the same way that they honored Jesus; they honored Him with their mouths, but their hearts were far from Him. The word hypocrisy comes from the word for “actor,” or “play-acting.” The honor of the Pharisees was an act. They performed this act so that they would be seen honoring Jesus and the prophets. They were courting the favor of the people and seeking to be esteemed by those who loved Jesus and the prophets. They loved the honor of men, and they loved for men to bow down to them in public. Deep generational iniquity was being passed down from their fathers. They maintained the same attitude as their fathers. On the outside they behaved as if they were respectful, but their inner attitude was one of despises prophets. Jesus called them on this by saying they were simply coating that sin and sealing it with a thick lacquer of whitewash. So, we know that iniquity can be passed down through the generations; thus the term, “generational iniquity.” We have a very vague idea of what generational iniauity looks like. We can conceive a seemingly infinite number of scenarios that might indicate the presence of generational iniquity. Generally, though, we look for patterns of destruction and devouring that occur pervasively and repeatedly throughout a family. From here, we do something which we call, “identificational repentance,” that simply means: •We perceive, through the Spirit, the presence of the twistedness, the iniquity. •We identify with those in our family line who fell into this sin (as in Dan 9). •We confess it as sin. •We place that sin in the hands of Jesus on the cross. •We turn away from it and turn back to God (repent). We also ask the Lord to remove the curses and consequences that resulted from that iniquity. In other words, the process is the same process of repentance described repeatedly by the prophets, and for that matter, by Jesus. The only wrinkle unique to identificational repentance is that we intentionally choose to identify with those in our family line, rather than being like the Pharisee who says, “Thank you, God, that you didn’t make me like that sinner.” God expresses His heart for this repentance clearly in Leviticus 26:40: “But if they confess their iniquity and the iniquity of their fathers, with their unfaithfulness in which they were unfaithful to Me, and that they also have walked contrary to Me.”
In this way, we can “work out our salvation through fear and trembling.” We must be careful, however, as we walk through this process, to rely on the guidance of the Holy Spirit, for we cannot conquer iniquity through our own power or might, but only by His Spirit, Who is released to us through our faith in Jesus. Let my words implore you to understand this as the primary and the most important caveat of all. Do what you must to get this imprinted. Picture a drill sergeant, and imagine the sound of thunder booming through these words as you reread them. Rely on the Holy Spirit. In identificational repentance, identify with those who committed the sin and repent for their sin.
I emphasize this again because we cannot manipulate God. He is indeed Jehovah rapha, the God who heals. He is the liberator we seek. But we cannot force His hand by our actions, our formulas, our procedures, or our protocols into acting in a particular manner. He forgives because He wants to, because He is our Father, and He loves us so much He sent Jesus to bear all the weight that we cannot. He does not act because we found the secret formula to force His hand, or because of our own merits, but because of Who He is.
|